Search for: "RELATIVITY AND ABOVE THE LAW" Results 6541 - 6560 of 9,446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2025, 7:17 am by NBlack
She writes regular columns for Above the Law, ABA Journal, and The Daily Record, has authored hundreds of articles for other publications, and regularly speaks at conferences regarding the intersection of law and emerging technologies. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 11:07 am by Vanessa Vidal, Esq.
Many legal departments have affected cost-cutting measures, and most are now working at or above capacity. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 11:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Understandably, the House has been reluctant to tighten its self-regulatory sub judice rules given the relative rarity of MPs straying into this area. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 3:40 pm
The reasoning of Stone has been applied in similar and analogous contexts in other cases involving canine sniffs that became relatively more invasive as the sniff progressed. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 7:53 am by Brad Hokanson
The above statute is known as the Trust Fund Recovery Penalty (“TFRP”). [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
  This is because, in certain circumstances, the law allows a ‘right to reply’ to a defamatory attack. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 10:49 pm
  If they actually end-up taking their assets and leaving the UK in their 80's and 90's, it may actually inspire the British law makers to rethink their tax law. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 4:21 pm by Geoffrey Manne
Yes, I’m sure business will eagerly embrace the FTC’s use of this statute, particularly as the agency defends it precisely on the ground that its use is relatively unconstrained by courts and their pesky rule of law. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 3:42 am
The most important lesson that we learned at Stanford Law School we learned on the very first day, when Dean Bayless Manning, welcoming the entering class in 1968, stated (and here we paraphrase): "If you learn nothing else here at Stanford Law School, please learn that in this world 99% of the people think that they are the ones wearing the white hats. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:44 am by Katy Sheridan
As such, without safeguards, such a test would arbitrary, and be an infringement of both the ECHR and EU law. [103]-[105] The appeal to the Supreme Court The Supreme Court may resolve any disagreement as to the applicable test, as set out above. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The Privacy Commissioner reached such a conclusion despite the transient nature of the network data and the “relative” length and complexity of the metadata retrieval process. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 2:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
This protection is afforded under Side A, as discussed above. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 4:33 am by David J. DePaolo
The original excuse was to promote my law practice but the reality was that it was just a challenge. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:49 pm by Bruce E. Boyden
” Before Peters, the case law was relatively clear that the only way a court could grant summary judgement on the ultimate liability threshold of “improper copying,” as I’ve been referring to it, is if it found that no reasonable jury could conclude that the two works, considered as a whole, were substantially similar. [read post]
3 Jun 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Under the model I described above, a "book" will no longer be a tangible item, not even, say, a floppy disk. [read post]