Search for: "Reproductive Rights" Results 6541 - 6560 of 8,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 8:49 am by Glenn
” (For example, publishers feel the royalty for reproductions in CDs and digital downloads, currently 9.1 cents, is a depressed rate compared to what publishers and songwriters could command on an open market.) [read post]
15 Jun 2008, 8:25 pm
  Making unauthorized copies violates the copyright owner's exclusive reproduction right, and selling unauthorized copies violates the copyright owner's exclusive distribution right. [read post]
16 Sep 2007, 3:24 am
Commercial rights and IP to the initial 6 ESC lines developed by the founders were transferred to ESI. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 4:40 am
The fact that incest disgusts most of us may be genetically adaptive in helping us to avoid relatively higher-risk reproduction. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 12:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
One of the event’s sponsors is the Harvard chapter of Law Students for Reproductive Justice(LSRJ). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:26 am
 Reproduction of a work through the involvement of a "voluntary human process" in accessing a webpage failed to satisfy the criteria of the 'temporary and transient copying' defence. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:41 pm by Tonya Gisselberg
The PMC copyright page indicates that “[t]he respective copyright holders retain rights for reproduction, redistribution and reuse.... [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:46 pm by Deborah Wald
(3) EGG DONATION LAW SUIT: As if these two major decisions weren't enough to digest in one week, I arrived in my office this morning to word that a class action lawsuit has just been filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California challenging the efforts of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) to set maximum compensation parameters for commercial egg donation. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 7:43 am by Marguerite Kenner
., the Court considered the Massachusetts Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act (the “Act”) which makes it a crime to stand on a public road or sidewalk within thirty-five feet of a reproductive health care facility hence creating “buffer zones” outside of such facilities. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 11:45 pm
Was Bad Science right to comply? [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 1:14 pm by Shelby Everest
In many instances, companies have simply decided not to offer products for sale in California that are perfectly legal and fit for use in other states — and that, in fact, have no observable carcinogenic or reproductive effect. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by William McDonald
” Oklahoma Governor Kevin Stitt signed an executive order directing schools and state agencies to define “female” as a “person whose biological reproductive system is designed to produce ova” and “male” as a “person whose biological reproductive system is designed to fertilize the ova of a female. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 1:11 pm by Maribeth Meluch
That begs the question as to whether male workers who experience work limitations due to infertility, erectile dysfunction or other reproductive matters will also be covered. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 6:14 am by Bridget Crawford
Call for Presentations on Specific Workshop Themes The first type of concurrent session will feature presentations on each of the following equality-related themes: • Gender and International Human Rights • From Reproductive Rights to Reproductive Justice • Gender and Economic Inequality • Gender and Criminal Law • Gender and Corporate, Securities, Tax, Bankruptcy and Commercial Law • Gender and the Justice System •… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:01 am by PunditMom
Was it a move to advance the far right’s larger efforts to cut women off from reproductive health care, especially for those who can’t afford it on their own because they lack health insurance? [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 1:14 pm by Shelby Everest
In many instances, companies have simply decided not to offer products for sale in California that are perfectly legal and fit for use in other states — and that, in fact, have no observable carcinogenic or reproductive effect. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Yet, the Human Rights Watch maintains that gender testing violates fundamental rights to privacy and dignity. [read post]