Search for: "S. W., an individual" Results 6541 - 6560 of 11,737
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
However, case law has established that "[w]hen a patentee chooses to sell an item, that product “is no longer within the limits of the monopoly” and instead becomes the “private, individual property” of the purchaser, with the rights and benefits that come along with ownership". [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 10:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  “[W]here the named juice is not the predominant juice, the common or usual name for the product shall ... [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 11:21 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Maronick) surveyed 251 individuals over 18 who (1) lived in California, (2) were their household’s primary food shopper or shared responsibilities for food shopping, and (3) purchased or considered purchasing processed honey in the two months preceding the Survey. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 8:51 am by Steve Kalar
Therefore, we do not depart from the usual, elements-based, categorical approach to determine whether Reinhart's prior state statutes of conviction trigger the federal mandatory minimum provision in § 2252(b)(2) for individuals with prior offenses ‘relating to’ child pornography. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:42 am
Recently, the appellate court ruled, reversing the district court's holding. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:03 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
  It was in no small measure in the face of the same dilemma during the first George W. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 7:23 am by John Bellinger
” And Judge Reggie Walton, a George W. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 9:45 am by Gordon Todd
  In the seven weeks following Senator Kerry’s clinching of the Democratic nomination, President George W. [read post]
22 May 2012, 9:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
On November 12, 2009, defendant pled guilty to two counts of disorderly persons harassment against the two individuals who heard defendant’s conjectures at the lunch truck, N.J.S.A. 2C:33–4. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 9:38 am by Eugene Volokh
[W]e conclude that the Sheriff's warning signs are compelled government speech, and their placement violates a homeowner's First Amendment rights. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 3:00 pm
BC's PIPA says the consent of the individual is needed to disclose their personal information. [read post]