Search for: "State v. Country"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 23,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 6:13 pm
In Adams Outdoor Advertising LP v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
On Friday afternoon, the justices added four cases to their merits docket, including Seila Law v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 6:17 am
Largely, the country accommodated their demand. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:36 pm
While there have been challenges throughout the country to local, state and federal gun laws, few have been successful. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:09 am
V. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 9:29 am
"Just as foreigners should respect the letter of the law in this country, the United States should abide by its treaty obligations - not just at the federal level, but in state and local jurisdictions as well. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:20 am
Carter v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
When Chief Justice of the United States, Taney wrote the opinion for the Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 10:17 am
Supreme Court recognized sexual harassment as a form of sex discrimination in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 8:00 pm
In Raymond Edwards, II v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:34 am
The Court goes on to state that last term’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 10:00 pm
Is there something in common in respect of patent law and practice in these two countries? [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:19 pm
Sanders v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
In Dollar General Stores v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 12:47 pm
Back in April, this blog boldly predicted that the United States Supreme Court would exert little effort in dismissing the State of Montana’s effort to convince us that the Court’s holding in Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 2:37 pm
The CJEU’s ruling in DHL v ChronopostThe CJEU made it manifestly clear in its 2011 ruling in Case C-235/09 DHL v Chronopost [see previous Katpost here] that a Europe-wide injunction should only be granted in order to ensure that the proprietor can protect his trade mark, prohibiting only uses which affect or are liable to affect the functions of the trade mark. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 11:23 am
In Westfield v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 5:35 am
But when someone mentions Oklahoma to us in the context of litigation - we free associate "Ysbrand," as in Ysbrand v. [read post]
