Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 8,988
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2012, 3:44 am
In the courts of appeals… In State v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 6:57 pm
Co., 328 F.3d 462 (8th Cir.2003) (affirming the district court's selection of an arbitrator pursuant to section 5); ACEquip Ltd. v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 10:14 am
SOURCE: TEXAS SUPREME COURT - Honorable Hope Andrade v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:02 am
After thoroughly scrutinizing the record and given that overt racial discrimination persists in covered jurisdictions notwithstanding decades of section 5 preclearance, we, like the district court, are satisfied that Congress’s judgment deserves judicial deference. [read post]
17 May 2012, 12:09 pm
First, the Commission argued that Judge Rakoff erred requiring that the proposed consent judgment be supported by admitted or judicially established facts – such a ruling was contrary to established law. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:01 am
SOURCE: United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
The district court agreed. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:38 am
The district court agreed. [read post]
17 May 2012, 8:47 am
The cases will be prosecuted in the Lawrence District Court. [read post]
17 May 2012, 4:59 am
As the 8th District’s decision a couple weeks ago in State v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 2:39 pm
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois rejected defense arguments in EEOC v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 8:32 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. [read post]
15 May 2012, 2:09 pm
” On Friday, the US District Court issued a 350 pages decision, dismissing 94 out of the 99 claims of copyright infringement. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am
Thomas could not offer the United States District Court jury his opinion on the legality of the contributions. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:16 am
SALVESON, Plaintiff, -vs- KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Defendant.CIV. 104045UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA2012 U.S. [read post]
11 May 2012, 5:18 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
11 May 2012, 1:37 pm
District of Columbia, writing in the Virginia Law Review that Heller may one day become the conservatives’ Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:27 am
This decision, although being ‘just’ a preliminary injunction, set the stage for the term ‘active hosting’ as used by the district court of Milan in its decision RTI v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 6:51 am
Bush’s promise of robust review of the legality of the Guantanamo detainees’ detention has been effectively negated by decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, beginning with Al-Adahi v. [read post]
