Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 8,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2017, 1:00 am
See General Foods Corporation v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:04 am
After the jump a few words about: Holder v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 9:01 pm
Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union did not simply allow arbitrary actions by state actors—or not only that. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
All Section 103 of SOPA does is give copyright holders a new tool to more effectively protect their work from commercial misappropriation. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
" But NRA v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
At the same time, the state's responsibility of deference appears to be deficient. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
Highland v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am
In R (on the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] UKSC 56, [2021] All ER (D) 53 (Dec), the Supreme Court found there was no positive obligation on the state to provide the option of an ‘X’ gender category on passports. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 12:55 pm
W and B v. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
(Laurence Kaye on Digital Media Law) United States US General David Kappos confirmed as USPTO Director (IP Watchdog) (Patently-O) (Anticipate This!) [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Holder, 626 F. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:29 pm
For both rights holders and online platforms, it’s a case of watch this space! [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 9:29 pm
For both rights holders and online platforms, it’s a case of watch this space! [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 6:55 am
(C.M.) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]
