Search for: "State v. Losee" Results 6541 - 6560 of 13,194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2014, 4:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  It has to do with the procedural requirements for a habeas petitioner who prevails on one issue but loses on the others, and who wants the court of appeals to review the others when the state appeals on the one it lost. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 6:39 am by Kate Howard
United States 15-8544Issue: (1) Whether Johnson v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:54 pm by Anthony Zaller
  On October 21, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the NLRB’s ruling in Three D, LLC v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:17 pm by Rory Little
But the state charged him criminally and the new job offer was withdrawn. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 6:20 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Petitions for Reconsideration (Recon) are losing their way and delaying their arrival at the Appeals Board. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm by Ronald Mann
The first thing we learned this morning with the announcement of the decision in McGirt v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
  On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]