Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 6541 - 6560
of 11,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2013, 11:14 am
United States v Harper, Department of Revenue of Montana v Kurth Ranch, Cordero v Lalor, and United States v Ursery settled that a sanction in a "civil" or non-criminal proceeding may constitute punishment for double jeopardy purposes. [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:49 am
Fifield v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 1:35 pm
The case is United State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:16 am
” However, according to the HR Policy Association, the Sec. 503 regulations “will effectively impose a rigid numerical system that, for all practical purposes, would require federal contractors to design their workforces to ensure that seven percent of all persons in each of the company’s job groups would be individuals with disabilities. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
See EEOC v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 6:23 am
In 2010, a new CEO laid off seven workers. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 3:36 pm
Scheindlin, (Floyd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The recent Apple v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 3:44 pm
A stated that the defendant's primary drug of choice is marijuana but that he had used cocaine intermittently over a long period of time. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 7:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:57 am
In Church of Grace and Glory v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 1:05 am
Citizen v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 3:31 pm
By Andrew DelaneyANR v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
That was the question that was asked of the New Jersey Supreme Court in Emma v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 4:27 am
FLIR Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:18 pm
Last week, the Utah Supreme Court issued its opinion in Delta Canal Co. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 9:27 am
In Adair v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:35 am
The licence to use this software was set to run for seven years, but could be extended for a further three years in six-month blocks. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 2:08 am
As you know by now, in the opinion issued in Shelby County v. [read post]
