Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. " Results 6541 - 6560 of 8,961
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Nov 2010, 5:34 pm by Kelly
– Three-strikes proposal by Piracy Committee (Spicy IP) (Techdirt) Ireland Irish Government wants file-sharing compromise, or legislation will follow (TorrentFreak) Latin America Public Knowledge joins Latinos for internet freedom (Public Knowledge) Netherlands The Hague Court of Appeals: Usenet community not guilty of copyright infringement (TorrentFreak) Sweden The Pirate Bay, one year after the tracker shut down (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom David’s fair use Silicon… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 2:28 pm by PJ Blount
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:47 pm
Part I considers the structures and premises of the emerging governance framework built into the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGP), and the three pillar framework from which it arose (state duty to protect, corporate responsibility to respect, and effective remedies for adverse effects of human rights), as it has been incorporated into the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 2:29 pm by Mark Walsh
The chief justice says that Justice Neil Gorsuch has the opinion in United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 4:39 am by SHG
Roosevelt asked the men of the Philippines to fight, promising them United States citizenship and veterans benefits in return. 200,000 fought. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 10:17 am by Dan Harris
See China Enforces United States Judgment: This Changes Pretty Much Nothing. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG)   United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 3:29 am by Marie Louise
(PatLit) EWHC (Ch) Looney v Trafigura – a fable of copyright communication (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General US IP Enforcement Coordinator issues annual report (IP Watch) US Chamber of Commerce releases 2011 IP policy agenda (IP Watch) New White House IP Advisory Committees elevate IP enforcement to highest level (IP Watch) (Patent Baristas) (Copyright Alliance) (The Domains) Jimmie Reyna to finally get confirmation hearing (Inventive Step) US to refresh… [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 1:42 pm
  However, the court recognized that the Federal Motor Carrier Safety regulations govern the operation of commercial motor vehicles in the United States. [read post]