Search for: "1-8 Doe" Results 6561 - 6580 of 32,315
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2007, 3:15 pm
Astra offers no convincing reason why Emert does not apply.2 See also Geneva Pharms., Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am by Fiona de Londras
Lord Hope’s Decision in Powell I don’t intend here to go through the facts of Powell but rather to outline the stages of the review required that Lord Hope lays out in the judgment: 1. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 5:00 am
The following information does not take into consideration penalties for breath test/chemical test refusals. [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 12:00 pm
The following information does not take into consideration penalties for breath test/chemical test refusals. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:20 am by Anthony Zaller
  Even though the accrual of the paid sick leave does not begin until July 1, 2015, this protection of employees and the creation of a rebuttable presumption is effective January 1, 2015. 2. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 11:16 am by Elizabeth A. Khalil
   What the Rule Does Not Do As mentioned above, the payday rule does not address some of the most hotly scrutinized issues in state law, such as permissible interest rates and fees. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 7:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
”   For the supporters of Proposition 8, “Article III standing” is probably not a legal arena where they want to be tested; the current Supreme Court’s majority does not have an expansive view of who can qualify for “standing. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 8:53 am by WIMS
Land transaction application Background & details on the Graymont Land Transaction <> CRC Releases Analysis of Proposal 15-1: Sales and Motor Fuel Tax Increases Related to Transportation Funding - The Citizens Research Council of Michigan has released its analysis of Proposal 15-1, which will appear on the statewide ballot at a special election on May 5, 2015 … [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:31 am by Nico Cordes
Allowability of the objection2.1 Legal basis of the objection2.1.1 The appellant has not argued that there was any reason for exclusion under Article 24(1) EPC, nor does the present board see any basis for the application of Article 24(1) EPC either. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm by Dennis Crouch
Nor does the PTO inquire into whether the famous person also sells the goods or services in question, as it does with private individuals under Section 1052(c). [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 5:49 am by Kellie McTammany
It DOES matter when you opt-in to take your social security benefit. [read post]