Search for: "DOES 1-12" Results 6561 - 6580 of 28,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2011, 11:35 am by Ian Ayres
The key, and to my mind alarming, results were succinctly stated:Results: 111 subjects (99 F, 12 M) completed all Week 12 assessments. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:35 pm by Jay Shepherd
On the other hand, AP has reported that the contract does say it can't begin the show later than 12:05.) [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 9:43 am by mocha
An eligible employee is entitled to 12 weeks of paid leave benefits up to 12 months from the date of the qualifying event. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This text is the same as the text of Article 11(3) RPBA of 1 May 2003, the explanatory notes to which state the following (CA/133/02 dated 12 November 2002): “This provision does not contradict the principle of the right to be heard pursuant to A 113(1) since that Article only affords the opportunity to be heard and, by absenting itself from the OPs, a party gives up that opportunity”. [5.3] The Board follows the line taken in decision T 1704/06 [7.6],… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This text is the same as the text of Article 11(3) RPBA of 1 May 2003, the explanatory notes to which state the following (CA/133/02 dated 12 November 2002): “This provision does not contradict the principle of the right to be heard pursuant to A 113(1) since that Article only affords the opportunity to be heard and, by absenting itself from the OPs, a party gives up that opportunity”. [5.3] The Board follows the line taken in decision T 1704/06… [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:39 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  In particular, the Commission determined to review:  (1) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “oven” relating to both the ‘614 and ‘942 patents; (2) the ALJ’s construction of the claim term “sawing” relating to both the ‘614 and ‘942 patents; (3) the ALJ’s determination that the accused process does not infringe, either literally or under the doctrine of equivalents, claims 12, 15, 31-32,… [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 8:55 pm
 His key reasons are given at paragraphs 12-13 reproduced below: [12]                        Rule 68 is mandatory and requires that actions qualifying as expedited actions proceed under the provisions of the rule. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 1:07 am
Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition §12:12 (4th ed. 2008) ("As Judge Posner remarked [in Ty Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:25 am by Silver Law Group
On 12/1/2022, Silva e-signed a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver & Consent (AWC) acknowledging the sanction of being indefinitely barred from any affiliation with any FINRA member in any capacity, effective 12/6/2022. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:30 am by Doug Cornelius
Rule 3a4-1 (a)(3) Beyond that threshold requirement, there are several other hurdles under the rule. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 9:58 pm
The appendix is a listing only and does not signify any particular level of risk with those debentures. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 7:42 pm
The illness usually lasts four to seven days and often does not require treatment. [read post]