Search for: "Doe" Results 6561 - 6580 of 546,267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 7:00 am by Lauren Ellerman
She does this not once but twice and then leaves the area. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 11:03 am by Glenn Reynolds
NICK GILLESPIE: When Wall Street Makes Crap Loans, It’s a Crisis; When DOE’s Steven Chu Does It, It’s Green Energy. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" As Krupski is a mistaken-defendant case and not a John Doe replacement case, it does not overrule Barrow. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 7:04 am
," under Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45 on the ground that the specimen of use (below) does not show the mark depicted in the drawing, i.e., the drawing is not a substantially exact representation of the mark as shown on the specimen. [read post]
21 Mar 2015, 12:51 pm by Jon Gelman
Does the present workers' compensation system really have a place any longer in the iEverything world? [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by Stuart Buck
But if KIPP is so bad, what does that say about the thousands of poor minority parents who voluntarily sign up for KIPP? [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:30 am
This does not look to be available if there is no deal. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 4:22 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
As such, we do notsustain the rejection of claim 5.In re Bond is cited:Such adistinction does not persuasively demonstrate the finding is in error becausethe nomenclature is not controlling. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 7:12 pm by David Oscar Markus
Smith’s challenge to be heard in a federal court does not mean he would prevail. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 8:12 am by Stuart Buck
But if KIPP is so bad, what does that say about the thousands of poor minority parents who voluntarily sign up for KIPP? [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 am by Jon Gelman
The 5th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that The Texas Workers' Compensation Act does not preempt the Medicare Secondary Payer (MSP) 42 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:32 am
 Ultimately, the majority (opinion by Justice Kagan) reached the rather uncontroversial conclusion that paying someone a set rate "per day" does not meet the requirement that they be paid a weekly salary. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:06 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
That lemmings follow does not prove validity.The "exclusive license" business may not be relevant here, given that Sidecar is gone. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 7:00 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The statute does not define it, so the Court looks to the dictionary, Webster's New International Dictionary, the unabridged second edition from 1934, issued around the time of the FLSA. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 7:08 am by Glenn Reynolds
IF THE RIGHT DOES IT, IT’S MCCARTHYISM: Guilt-by-high-school-classmate. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:26 pm by rtruman
Does the 1st Amendment Cover Clicking ‘Like’ on Facebook? [read post]
4 May 2011, 7:00 am by Glenn Reynolds
THIS SEEMS RIGHT: An IP Address Does Not Point To A Person, Judge Rules. [read post]