Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 41,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2012, 12:09 pm
The appropriate minimum term was 10 years. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 3:00 am
As a hypothetical example, if there were evidence that 50% of the population regularly use hemp products, 10% regularly use marijuana, and 1% regularly use cocaine or methamphetamine, a dog’s alert by itself would seem to be of doubtful value since the statistically most likely explanation for the alert would be the lawful possession of hemp. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 6:40 am
Does conceiving (pun intended) of abortion as tethered to women's health result in more authority, autonomy, equality, or safety for women -- or less? [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 6:04 am
Do not insulate yourself from the prospect of starting over with nothing. 10. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm
” §7412(n)(1)(A). [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 11:33 am
Simply because there is a general agreement upon something does not actually make it true. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:11 am
Plaintiff does not deny signing the documents, which were notarized the same day. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:25 am
So, setting aside why FSIS does not consider Salmonella an adulterate and does not have the power to order a recall, why does Tyson recall its product after seven sickened and Foster Farms recalls nothing after 550 sickened in two outbreaks? [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:30 am
While fiber optic cables largely make up the backbone (Tier 1) networks, only 10 percent of Americans had “fiber to the home” as of 2017. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
The same applies to auxiliary requests 1 to 10. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 5:18 am
—In this section: (1) The term “eligible child” means a child (as defined in section 12(d) or served under section 11(a)(1) of the Richard B. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 9:57 am
Tyson Farms, Inc.Docket: 10-542Issue(s): (1) Whether an injury to competition must be pleaded and proved to establish liability for violation of § 192(a) and (b) of the Packers and Stockyards Act; and (2) whether, assuming that § 192 is ambiguous, the courts should have deferred, under Chevron U.S.A. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 10:09 am
We are talking 1% a year of something like 20 BILLION dollars, or maybe 10 billion, or 50 billion, And then the 20% on profits. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 8:10 am
While the bones of the Report are already likely firmly established and unlikely to change, whatever the comments received, commentary at this point might be useful for several reasons:1. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 9:10 pm
” Interval at *10-11 (text added, footnote removed).Representative Claim LanguageClaim 1 of the ’314 patent is representative: [...] [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 11:42 am
American Eagle Express, No. 10-1764 (E.D. [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 2:28 am
On 25.10.2019, the applicant submitted further argumentation in support of accepting a machine as the inventor, arguing Rule 19(1) EPC does not require that the inventor is a human and explaining that the purpose of Rule 19(1) EPC is to properly identify the inventor. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 6:57 am
The intention to authorise debiting of the deposit account does NOT already allow the EPO to act on such authorisation and carry out such intent where the EPO, under the deposit account system, already holds such money in trust (deviation in particular from T 1265/10, at point 15), (see point 3.4.3 of the quotation from the summons under point 1 of the Reasons).2. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:51 am
It was undisputed that the videos depicted an ECC-10 cutout cover placed on a polymer cutout and that ECC-10 covers are designed for larger porcelain cutouts. [read post]
