Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 27,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2010, 3:51 am
Specht v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 1:34 pm
On Wednesday in Edwards v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 3:04 am
It stated that the commissions may become so large that the relationship cannot be regarded as fair if the customer is kept in ignorance. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 10:21 am
COLE V. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 6:00 am
Id. at 90 (discussing State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
The UCL’s “ ‘purpose is to protect both consumers and competitors by promoting fair competition in commercial markets for goods and services. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
Bar discipline, mostly secret in many states. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:42 am
In a recent legal decision - Yamin v. [read post]
5 Dec 2020, 5:58 am
I have stated many times that I am pleased that the USDOL has taken again to issuing Opinion Letters which guide employers in complying with the Fair Labor Standards Act. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 8:56 am
Facts of the Case In the case of McCormick v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 2:38 am
State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 1:56 am
Indeed, this would be a fair alternative reading of The Hague LD’s first instance reasoning, at least in relation to provisional measures. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:37 am
The question is whether it's unconstitutional for the state to make public donors to that Proposition. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:33 pm
United States mirrors the claims from Trump impeachment 1.0] In Trump v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:50 am
Carl is admitted in the State of Delaware and regularly practices before the Delaware Court of Chancery, with an emphasis on shareholder disputes. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 4:47 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am
Glazer and Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 8:16 am
The State appealed. [read post]
