Search for: "In Interest of C." Results 6561 - 6580 of 42,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2020, 8:02 am by IncNow
“B” does not refer to a subchapter of the Internal Revenue Code, in the way “S” or “C” do. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 1:29 pm by IncNow
“B” does not refer to a subchapter of the Internal Revenue Code, in the way “S” or “C” do. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:55 am by SHG
It's an interesting post, well worth the read. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:46 am by Randy Coleman
A recent study by Lincoln Financial provides some interesting data that reflects a general understanding by American consumers of the value of long term care insurance, and long-term care planning, but less than half of the people surveyed took any positive action to prepare for what are often unanticipated costs.One of the most significant mistakes Americans are making, according to the study, is thinking that investments and social programs such as Social Security and Medicare will cover… [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:12 am by Gary Nitzkin
It’s one thing to read news and simply acknowledge the article as containing something of interest.  [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 10:12 am by Gary Nitzkin
It’s one thing to read news and simply acknowledge the article as containing something of interest. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 2:34 pm by Ron
THE POTENTIAL EXPLANATIONS - Firms lack interest - The CIO has no time - Individual partner and institutional firm interests diverge - Lawyers are too risk averse - Firms lack investment capital - Firm management has no time - Law and legal advice are too complex - Clients lack interest WHAT THE FUTURE MAY HOLD - Alternatives to BigLaw gain share, in part with client-facing technology - Some large law Firms Innovate to build systems, they gain share - Clients act on their… [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:52 am by Erin Kristofco
I urge you to reconsider your support of this bad bill and to show your constituents that their interests come before the interests of the insurance lobby. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But then things get interesting. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 6:53 am by Aaron Wudrick
They are happy to conflate their own interest with the national interest whenever they can! [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 7:46 am
., decided 4/2/2009)In a unanimous opinion authored by Judge Piggott, the New York Court of Appeals today REVERSED the Third Department's 2007 decision in this case and ruled:Attorneys' fees on awarded no-fault benefits are to be calculated consistent with the New York State Insurance Department's Office of General Counsel Opinion of October 8, 2003, based on the aggregate of all bills for each insured disputed in a single action or arbitration, and not based on a "per bill"… [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 12:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
This is easier when there’s a potential copyright claim (which is not subject to §113(c), which very few people remember). [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 10:01 pm by Josh Blackman
Third, the conditions must "relate" to "the federal interest" for which the spending program was established. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 10:23 am
 Recently the Ugandan High Court issued an interesting decision that to some extent echoes the outcome of the Fenty v Arcadia UK litigation. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:23 pm by Howard Knopf
The final transcript is not yet available.PROBLEMS WITH BILL C-86 APPROACH TO BOARD REFORM1. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 2:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Personal experience with multiple Bita Amanis with related interests. [read post]