Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 35,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Sep 2008, 8:47 am
The United States Supreme Court reversed. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 12:09 am
In April 2016, the Department of Labor’s Administrative Review Board (ARB) settled a twenty-year dispute in Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, United States Department of Labor v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:29 pm
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Katz v. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 12:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 3:06 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia reversed the TTAB's ruling in Bayer Consumer Care AG v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
In her majority opinion, Justice Elena Kagan held that administrative law judges are officers of the United States, not employees, and so they have to be appointed under the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:50 am
Early (shortly after midnight) on Thursday, Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California somewhat surprisingly denied a renewed motion for a permanent injunction against Samsung that Apple had filed in December about a month after an appeals court had remanded a previously-denied injunction bid to the district court. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
My infatuation began with Judge Evans' opinion in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 1:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 3:03 pm
United States (U.S. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Since colonial times, anti-miscegenation laws had existed in British North America and, after the Revolutionary War, in the United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 2:15 pm
Tamman also argues that the ICA erred in failing to address the underlying issue of the Hawaii Court’s jurisdiction over the divorce proceeding because it was brought by a non-resident who did not possess lawful United States status. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 10:32 am
A few observations from reading numerous FOSTA cases: sex trafficking victim cases are horrifying. courts cannot figure out how to interpret FOSTA. due to FOSTA’s ambiguities, judges are turning to judicial activism to favor victims regardless of the law. the doctrinal errors judges are making in FOSTA cases may migrate into standard Section 230 jurisprudence, which would cause significant problems for UGC that Congress thought FOSTA wouldn’t reach. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:20 pm
In Joffe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 5:57 pm
Ericsson said some of Apple's claim construction and validity arguments were untimely.ALJ Bhattacharyya's decisions are sealed for the time being, but the following screenshot from the ITC docket shows the outcome (click on the image to enlarge):This is not a good pretrial outcome for Apple.Starting Monday, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas will hold an Ericsson v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
A panel of the United States Fifth Circuit consisting of Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly and Graves recently issued a per curiam opinion regarding the effect of the Louisiana Underground Utilities and Facilities Protection Law (the “Louisiana One-Call Statute”). [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:23 am
Here are snippets of Harlan's effective write-up of the ruling (which goes by United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:37 am
A panel of the United States Fifth Circuit consisting of Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly and Graves recently issued a per curiam opinion regarding the effect of the Louisiana Underground Utilities and Facilities Protection Law (the “Louisiana One-Call Statute”). [read post]
