Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 13,306
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2013, 3:43 am
The decision from two weeks ago—a Friday—in LaBarre v. [read post]
15 Nov 2012, 5:40 am
See Thompson v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 4:11 am
Those rectangular shapes were visible from all sides and would not go unnoticed by consumers.e) Front label consisting of a prominent frame in the unusual ‘copper’ colourThe front label was in white colour and showed different shades or nuances ranging from copper to brown or gold with some ornamental patterns.f) The copper-coloured neck foil (neck wrapper)The wrapper that appeared on the neck of the bottle also showed different shades or nuances ranging… [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm
Sansi North America, LLC v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:59 am
Meanwhile, record labels and recording artists often earn twelve to fourteen times more than songwriters for a stream of the exact same song. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Silber v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 8:39 am
Sultanis v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 2:58 am
For instance, a case of this kind was recently decided in Sweden [disclaimer: my current employer represented one of the parties to the litigation].In late January 2018 the Patent and Market Court in Konsumentombudsmannen v Alexandra Media Sweden & Tourn Media (PMT 11949-16), ruled that famous Swedish blogger and influencer Kissie was responsible for misleading marketing on social media. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Jordan v. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:21 am
Three other-than-serious safety violations are failing to mount a fire extinguisher so it is readily available, not labeling circuit breakers, and using flexible cords and equipment cables that do not have strain relief. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:35 am
The case du jour is Dapeer v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:58 pm
Here's the amicus curiae brief of Sun founder Scott McNealy and former Sun Executive Vice President Brian Sutphin (this post continues below the document): Scott McNealy-Brian Sutphin Amicus Curiae Brief in Oracle v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
Geske v. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 7:04 am
Alpha Pro Tech, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 5:59 am
Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 11:23 am
The case is Lashley v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 3:00 pm
It was held that due process requires that when an individual is subject to the stigma of being labeled a sexual offender' and of a finding that he violated a criminal law triggering the possibility of institutional confinement, proof that he or she in fact committed the acts that form the basis for being labeled an offender' must be made beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 4:39 am
Brian Lichtenberg, LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 1:51 pm
Racies v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:02 am
” 44 Liquormart, Inc. v. [read post]
