Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 6561 - 6580 of 21,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2018, 9:33 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The court explained that, under the state’s recreational-use statute, a landowner who allows another to use their property, without cost, for recreational purposes cannot be held liable for injuries. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It does not, however, make any specific response to Pillinger’s argument or defend its common-law indemnification claim with any detail. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 2:23 am
Actavis | Can YouTube be primarily liable for users' infringements? [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:46 am by Michael S. Levine and Joshua S. Paster
  The insurers filed suit seeking a declaration that they had no duty to defend or indemnify, and moved for summary judgment based on a PPLI exclusion, which provided in pertinent part: The Insurer shall not be liable to make any payment for Loss in connection with a Claim made against any Insured based upon, arising out of, directly or indirectly resulting from or in consequence of, or in any way involving: (1) any prior or pending litigation, administrative or arbitration… [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 9:44 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Facts of the Case The plaintiff worked for a maintenance company that was contracted by the defendant casino to clean the casino’s air ducts. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:04 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant Mintzer, Sarowitz, Zeris, Ledva & Meyers, LLP (Mintzer) briefly represented the plaintiff Billiard Balls Management (Billiard Balls) in an underlying action in Kings County, Gershman v Ahmad (index No. 18893/12) (the Gershman matter, or the underlying action), where the plaintiff Lizaveta Gershman (Gershman) alleged that Billiard Balls was liable under the Dram Shop Act. [read post]
15 Sep 2018, 11:23 am
The owner of the dog will be the first defendant to pursue because of what is called, under California law, “Strict Liability. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 8:14 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
Therefore, the home could be held liable for the conduct and the punitive damages award could stand. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 6:49 pm by dhdlaw
  In Pennsylvania, as in other states, the courts will determine whether the child’s particular age and development was at a sufficiently high level that the defendant cannot be held liable for the harm. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 11:44 am by Elisabeth R. Connell
  The requirement of a “robust” causality requirement helps to safeguard potential defendants from claims that, in effect, seek to hold them “liable for racial disparities they did not create. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 9:18 am by Friedman, Rodman & Frank, P.A.
” The court held that because the hazard was easily observable by the plaintiff, the plaintiff was put on notice of the hazard’s existence and thus, the defendant could not be held liable for the plaintiff’s injuries. [read post]
Court Discusses Whether Employer’s Insurance Company Was Liable for Damages Caused by Employee’s Drunk-Driving Accident, Virginia Injury Lawyers Blog, August 31, 2018. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 4:01 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
” The Court of Appeals affirmed that defendant was liable, but reassessed defendant school 100% of the fault. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 9:53 am by Neumann Law Group
Michigan Premises Liability In order for the property owner to be liable for your injuries, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant was negligent. [read post]