Search for: "P. v. Long" Results 6561 - 6580 of 7,176
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2016, 5:45 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  As long as they find one unanimously, though, the jury need not be considered hung. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am by Bruce Ackerman
”(Ackerman & Fishkin, Deliberation Day, p. 6, quoting from Delli Carpini & Keeter’s comprehensive survey.) [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
In it, the central element is the Gender Law Project prepared by a long standing member of our group, Maybell Padilla Pérez. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am by Malcolm Mercer
Since the Supreme Court of Canada decided Rocket v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 2:46 am by Orin S. Kerr
The one-year retention period indicated in the EOPSS retention policy certainly is long enough to warrant constitutional protection. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Article 10.2 of the operating agreement authorizes such transfers without the necessity of obtaining the other member’s consent, so long as the transferor assumes the LLC’s expenses relating to the transfer and provides a legal opinion that the transfer will not trigger certain adverse tax consequences. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
Article 10.2 of the operating agreement authorizes such transfers without the necessity of obtaining the other member’s consent, so long as the transferor assumes the LLC’s expenses relating to the transfer and provides a legal opinion that the transfer will not trigger certain adverse tax consequences. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Lash has produced a single, critical resource for understanding a profound moment in American constitution making—a resource that is long, long overdue. . . . [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting case from a New Jersey family court, decided in August, but just released for publication earlier this month, D.G. v. [read post]