Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 7,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2008, 8:03 am
Ann. 1973 p. 298)". [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 10:08 am
Bite #7, Oregon Constitution: Bill of Rights, 40-42 (another long one!) [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 6:34 pm
Sasha pointed me to a long string of shipwreck/cannibalism cases and noted a common thread: who gets eaten in the end. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 2:33 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Australian Review of National Innovation System released: (IPRoo), (Mallesons Stephen Jaques), (creativecommons.org), (IP Menu News), Senate Committee on the Judiciary approval of Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Act 2008 and surrounding debate (Law360), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica), (Wired), (Public Knowledge), (Ars Technica),… [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 9:01 am
The issues presented by L.T.H. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:59 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 2:14 pm
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, September 05, 2008 US v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 12:15 pm
P'ship v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 1:49 pm
Case Name: Wolfe v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 7:15 pm
In US v. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 9:31 am
§ 261 ("[P]atents shall have the attributes of personal property. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 9:24 pm
P 2, 184 P.3d 890 (2008). [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
Edelen, No. 07-1189 Appeal of sentence for 126 months' imprisonment for one count of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base is dismissed where the appellate waiver, waiving defendant's right to file a direct appeal so long as the sentence imposed was within the applicable Guideline Sentencing Range or lower, was enforceable and valid. . [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:21 am
§ 261 ("[P]atents shall have the attributes of personal property. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:52 pm
P. app. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in… [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 8:26 am
This is from Peter V. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 1:15 am
See generally Greenwald v. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
(Id. at p. 217, fn. 15.) [read post]
