Search for: "Peters v. Peters" Results 6561 - 6580 of 7,549
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2012, 2:32 pm
Surely this is so in Israel, whose Supreme Court pronounced on targeted killings in Public Committee against Torture in Israel (2006), and in the United States, whose Supreme Court held in Hamdan v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This is a complicated area of the law which has recently been subject to scrutiny by the Supreme Court in Burnett or Grant v International Insurance Company (here). [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 1:00 am by Frank Cranmer
” And finally…II Peter Crumpler reminded us of the legal issues which faced the Gunnersbury Baptist Church during the previous heatwave and drought in 1976. [read post]
Patentability of Medical Devices in Brazil Article 10 of the Brazilian Industrial Property Statute (Law No. 9,279/96) outlines what isn’t considered patent-eligible subject matter, with item VIII excluding diagnostic, therapeutic, and surgical methods practiced on the human or animal body, and item V excluding software per se. [read post]
17 Oct 2009, 8:51 am by Patrick Hindert
Industry developments featured: NSSTA General Counsel Craig Ulman; NSSTA lobbyist Eric Vaughn; NSSTA Legal Committee representatives - Peter Vodola; Ilana Hanau; Michael Miller; and Mark Alpert. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 4:51 am by jonathanturley
It appears to follow Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s test for pornography in his concurring opinion in Jacobellis v. [read post]
9 Feb 2008, 2:20 pm
I don't think that Douglas, Peter, James, Theophilus Wildebeest and that blonde woman, whose name I can never remember, will be terribly impressed if I tell them that I haven't patented it because a lawyer I know says that patents are a waste of time. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:53 pm
Peter Bowler President and Chief Executive Officer American Eagle Airlines Captain Don Gunther Vice President for Safety Continental Airlines, Inc. … [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
(The Telegraph piece somehow manages to both explain that the judgment of Peter Jackson J was withheld from publication for a period to avoid prejudicing any criminal proceedings and still claim that “the girl’s death was shrouded in secrecy” in the same report). [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 10:44 am by Lisa Kennelly
Jay O'Keeffe: This summer, I had a good result in construction appeal, Dunn Construction Co. v. [read post]