Search for: "RELATIVITY AND ABOVE THE LAW" Results 6561 - 6580 of 9,446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm by Robert Wernli, Jr.
If all of the shareholders of the California corporation are “accredited investors,” as defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act,[5] then the analysis is relatively straight-forward. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:56 am
  While that decision was being considered by the Minnesota Supreme Court, the legislature enacted the Whistleblower statute referenced above. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 5:52 pm by Guest Author
  As I previously described in a post on these pages, this new requirement represented a relatively rare act of congressional institutionalism, with Democrats in Congress apparently putting checks and balances above party. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:00 pm by Melody McDonald Lanier
Because doxing is a relatively new phenomenon that is constantly evolving, there is currently no specific law that makes doxing in Texas illegal. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 4:26 pm by Tamara Piety
(It has been cited humdreds of times in treatises and other law reviews). [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:07 am by Neil H. Buchanan
  Wehner has a relatively high public profile, and I am glad that he is using it in the way that he did there. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 12:08 pm by Kevin Goldberg
As far as timing goes, if the bill is to pass at all, I think that would have to happen in 2015 or very early in 2016, since (as mentioned above) election year activities in 2016 will likely distract Congress. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 12:00 am by My name
In regards to federal assistance for higher education expenses, tax credits and deductions are relatively new.[2]   Lawmakers have increasingly used tax credits to aid students in covering the cost of college. [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:39 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Rather, the Challenged Statement appeared in a relatively small subset of Peloton’s advertisements, and did not appear in any television advertisements, which represented Defendant’s largest advertising channel during the Class Period. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm by Andrew Delaney
’s five years; that’s a really long time relative to M.W. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 12:57 pm by Howard Knopf
There is European law that might suggest otherwise in the case of scholarly editions of music, but I don’t believe that it would be followed in Canada, in light of CCH v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:12 am by Daniel Shaviro
  Whether it mattered or not politically, it's truly an artistic masterpiece, and one could spend an entire seminar session(say, if my colloquium was "law and literature") unpacking its various levels of communication.The paper's main focus, however, is on the following. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 1:46 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  If it is published, I will surely write a followup column here on Dorf on Law. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:53 am
Going forward, it's clear that we will be mostly out of Afghanistan relatively soon. [read post]
However, some may take the position that even without negotiating for their express exclusion, tariffs are not a basis for a MAC under the standard formulaic definitions of the term – the rationale being that such MAC clauses already exclude changes in laws from those changes that, if they were to have a negative impact on the target business, could form the basis of a MA [read post]
18 May 2022, 11:25 am by Ernesto Falcon
The biggest price tag is the one-time sunk cost of constructing the network itself, whereas actual operation of the network costs are relatively low, particular with fiber networks. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:27 am by Daniel Shaviro
Thus, to quote the paper at p. 37, n. 178, the SBD would not be available to "high-income employees (e.g., law professors) who perform low-cost consulting services on the side. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 8:08 am by Alessandro Cerri
These facts were borne from evidence which the High Court was entitled to accept; andOn due cause, the Court found (with some difficulty) that there was no error of law or principle in the High Court judge applying Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529 (Ch), in which Kitchin J had observed that the test for showing due cause is "relatively stringent" - in other words it is not enough to show that a sign has been innocently adopted, there must be something… [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
To the extent that this complaint was intended to embrace a fundamental procedural defect under A 112a(2)(d), no such complaint was substantiated in the petition or explained subsequently (see also point 2.1, above). [read post]