Search for: "ROUNDS v. STATE"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 7,592
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 7:13 am
However, such an approach not only raises the issue of eroding the rule-making powers of the entire Membership, but could lead to the resurgence of GATT a la carte approach which was the hallmark of the Tokyo Round (1974-1979). [read post]
20 May 2024, 5:01 am
This was already the question in 1996 when [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg penned the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 6:07 pm
X v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 3:39 am
The tweeter I mentioned further above would undoubtedly have preferred it the other way round: a 5-4 decision against PTAB in Oil States (then SAS would have been moot).Justice Gorsuch has now been on the opposite side of my desired outcome in three cases (Dimaya, Oil States, and SAS) in short succession. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:01 am
Phase I of the RDOF would allocate $16 billion for “wholly unserved” census blocks through a multi-round auction. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
The second Ordinance seeks to amend the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act passed by Parliament earlier this year to carve out India’s 29th State- Telangana from the erstwhile undivided State of Andhra Pradesh.[2] This Ordinance makes certain amendments to the territories covered by the Khammam district under this State bifurcation law. [read post]
25 Jun 2016, 6:10 pm
Fisher v. [read post]
19 Jan 2019, 8:13 am
It's a rather iPhone-centric perspective, but the biggest problem here for Qualcomm is that Judge Koh ruled in GPNE Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 5:43 am
See Reynolds v. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
More from Europe: In Case C-355/12 Nintendo v PC Box the CJEU said that circumventing a protection system may not be unlawful. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am
“There should be a clear legal recognition of Russia as a state sponsor of terrorism,” Zelenskyy said. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm
§ § 1-16, to the exclusion of any provisions of state law that are inconsistent with the federal act. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:55 pm
Both the "state action" decision and the "intermediate scrutiny" standard are under sharp attack in this new round in the case. [read post]
6 May 2010, 3:54 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:19 pm
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 11:27 am
In 2001, just months after Perry's ascension to Governor, the US Supreme Court ruled in Atwater v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 8:25 am
And as Justice Scalia pointed out in District of Columbia v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 9:52 am
On similar facts in State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:32 pm
When most of us hear the phrase “Online Gambling” or “Internet Gambling”, we usually picture the average websurfer casually placing a few bets on some rounds of Texas Hold’em. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 9:00 am
(UK Channel Management Ltd v E! [read post]
