Search for: "STEVENS v. STATE"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 7,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am
Rainwater, Steven G. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 7:36 pm
The State Bar of Texas recently appointed Prof. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
[9] · Should corporations be held directly accountable for protecting certain human rights, rather than only indirectly through the nation-state as the traditional bearer of human rights obligations? [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm
Two justices, Justices Stevens and Alito, do not participate in the cert. pool. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 8:20 am
In Hurley v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 5:35 am
(Dickerson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Apparently, the steady progress in civility that Steven Pinker, and other “progress” scholars, have noted over the centuries is a longer-term process. [read post]
15 May 2025, 11:55 am
See Walters v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
Indeed, a far better predictor of a justice’s vote is the justice’s ideology, rather than whether a justice uses a methodology like originalism or not to decide a case (think of Scalia and Justice John Paul Stevens in the District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:18 pm
Stevens, Lisa. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
[Under the Act,] the citizen must act "without authority of the United States. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm
Mayne v. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 6:52 am
I wonder how Orin would have predicted the grant of cert, which stated the question presented as follows: Whether the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms is incorporated as against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment’s Privileges or Immunities or Due Process Clauses. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:42 pm
The Federal closed area does not apply to any state waters. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:51 am
On July 27th the USPTO set up more stringent rules for the issuance of BMPs in their Interim Guidance for Determining Subject Matter Eligibility for Process Claims in View of Bilski v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 1:01 am
” [This became painfully evident in the 1896 Supreme Court case Plessy v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s 1985 ruling in Heckler v. [read post]
15 May 2025, 9:01 pm
These scholars likewise ignore the rationale of the landmark 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:05 am
Here’s Why That Won’t Happen.Center for Public Integrity – Sarah Kleiner | Published: 8/31/2017 Seizing on the specter of Russian election influence, Democrats have ramped up their quixotic effort to blunt Citizens United v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
So one might think, but in the 2015 case of Glossip v. [read post]
