Search for: "State v. Bill" Results 6561 - 6580 of 19,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm
The Court ruled in SB Liberty that Section 1363.05 of the California Civil Code (now found in Civil Code Section 4925) specifically states that members may attend an association’s board meetings. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 3:21 pm
The Court ruled in SB Liberty that Section 1363.05 of the California Civil Code (now found in Civil Code Section 4925) specifically states that members may attend an association’s board meetings. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Because this bill would expand the scope of the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.Existing law, the Corporate Securities Law of 1968, provides for the regulation of the issuance of corporate securities, requires the qualification of an offer or sale of securities, and provides for exemptions from qualification.This bill would exempt the issuance of a membership by a worker cooperative company, as specified, from certain… [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 8:26 am by Susan I. Nelson
Huffington Post by Bill Ong Hing, Professor of Law, University of San Francisco Last week marked the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 11:32 am by Jonathan Bailey
Google is no longer seen as a hero, especially outside the United States. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 4:24 am by SHG
Under a bill now making its way through the California State Legislature, millions of people in the state who have misdemeanor or lower-level felony records could be spared those problems: their criminal records would automatically be sealed from public view once they completed prison or jail sentences. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
9 Sep 2019, 12:44 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Hoopa Valley Tribe (Clean Water Act; Water Rights) Federal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/federal/2019.htmlUnited States of America v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
It is also a stringent exposition of the requirements of informed consent – and one which would find favour with GDPR proponents and those Parliamentarians shepherding the new Data Protection Bill through Parliament. [read post]