Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 6561 - 6580 of 14,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2014, 9:23 am by Dennis Crouch
At paragraph [212] the court said that: What is being claimed is not the nucleic acid as it exists in the human body, but the nucleic acid as isolated from the cell. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:54 am by Wells Bennett
 It thus appears that a majority of the court’s seven active judges wish to explore the rulings of two three-judge panels, one in Al-Bahlul and another in a closely related case, United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:51 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
When Hill went to trial on the charge that he robbed a body shop, the trial court excluded his 12 year-old brother from the courtroom. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:56 am by Michelle Gyves
Beginning this week, these bodies will begin negotiations to reconcile the three versions with a stated goal of promulgating a final regulation by the end of the year. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 6:01 pm by Lyle Denniston
The petition sought to raise three questions: the constitutionality of using the new procedure, including midazalom as the first drug; the application to current sentencing cases of the Court’s 2008 ruling in Baze v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
”[4] The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) acknowledges that estimating “risk” from low level exposures based upon laboratory animal data is fraught because of inter-specie differences in longevity, body habitus and size, genetics, metabolism, excretion patterns, genetic homogeneity of laboratory animals, dosing levels and regimens. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am by Matrix Law
On Thursday 9th March 2023 the Court will hear R (on the application of Toraane and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 348. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:30 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
On November 27, 2013, the European Court of Human Rights held a Grand Chamber hearing (which was broadcast on the Internet) in the case of S.A.S v. [read post]