Search for: "State v. Light"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 28,965
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2019, 10:42 am
The EAT stated that in its experience it is relatively rare for covert recordings to appear on a list of acts of gross misconduct in a disciplinary policy; however, this may change in light of this decision. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:07 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
In Center for Inquiry, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:02 am
And U.S. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2019, 7:08 am
In this case, the Second Circuit provides some guidance, finding that the plaintiff, a former Hofstra University employee, states a claim for sex discrimination in the wake of a student's harassment claim.The case is Menaker v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:24 pm
The first loan states:I acknowledge that the requested loan is subject to the limitations on dischargeability in bankruptcy contained in Section 523(a)(8) of the United States Bankruptcy Code. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
” Placing so much responsibility in the hands of “a couple hundred unaccountable staffers,” moreover, contributes to the concern that there is a “conspiratorial deep state [that] threatens the nation’s representative democracy. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 11:40 am
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Carrie Goldberg explained why Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act needs to be changed to hold communication platforms accountable for the safety of its users in light of ongoing litigation in the Herrick v. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 10:36 am
In Jones, the court stated: Neither Mr. [read post]
15 Aug 2019, 3:31 am
The royalty base is going to be outcome-determinative.Unless Avanci and its members somehow manage to get rid of this case, be it by means of a dismissal or by coercion (based on leverage over Continental's customers, such as Daimler, as a result of injunctions that German courts grant far more readily than their U.S. counterparts), this dispute will shed a lot of light--and possibly some very harsh light--on Avanci's business model and the intentions of its contributors.… [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 2:44 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:54 am
After the Council reviewed the Commission Proposal, the exequatur was removed along with the distinction between enforceable title in the Member State of origin and in the Member State of enforcement. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
Com’rs of Brevard Cnty. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:25 am
This decision is interesting to the AmeriKat in light of Henry Carr J's recent decision in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158 in May where it was made clear that the preliminary injunction test is a series of gateways (see Kat report here). [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:27 am
From Berryman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm
” That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:46 pm
See Delaware Trust Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:11 pm
In the recent CBC v. [read post]
