Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 13,252
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2014, 11:06 pm
The US Supreme Court accepted review on a case where exactly that happened—in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 12:07 pm
The Merritts have had five chances to state this claim. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Of course, as is evident from the decision of the US Supreme Court in FTC v Actavis [3], many would agree that “effective competition” is desirable. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 7:26 am
Housh v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:39 am
Ct. 1426 (2013), and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 5:05 am
The result In Walsworth v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 4:18 am
The ruling in Ritchie v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 9:53 am
[Ed. note -- Sorry for the delay; Jon and I were both out late last week.]United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:20 am
Under Section 4(a), the purchase price is fair market value as a going concern, to be determined by an independent evaluator. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 8:45 pm
Although the first prong of this two-prong test is not labeled as such, it is essentially the same type of inquiry as the "predominant purpose/secondary effects" test enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in City of Renton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:27 pm
I was perfectly content with my life until Jeremy suggested that I blog about the United States Patent and Trademark Office (TTAB) Harry Winston v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 8:45 am
(The case is EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York rejected each of these theories, and dismissed the plaintiff’s claims in their entirety as a matter of law this past week in Dimond, et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:54 am
On July 9, 2014, in Dilts v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:35 am
In Rowe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 5:01 am
In most states, sales tax is computed with respect to the cost of goods and services exclusive of tips unless the tip is built into the stated price. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
” “...In addition, we want to send a message to anyone who continues to willfully and aggressively evade our tax laws by hiding money overseas that they will pay a higher price for that noncompliance. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 3:12 pm
" Price v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:20 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
