Search for: "State v. Seven"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 11,120
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2013, 6:27 pm
Walling v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 12:01 pm
So we're five or six or seven years out and we're still in the middle of the lawsuit. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:57 am
See International Trade Commission v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
” In the seven years since Bridgeport, courts outside the Sixth Circuit (which, it should be noted, is not a particularly influential jurisdiction when it comes to copyright law to begin with) apparently continue to look at substantial similarity between an original sound recording and the sampling work, including considering whether the use is de minimis. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:16 am
Circuit struck down the Obama EPA’s Cross-State Air Pollution Rule in EME Homer City Generation v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:11 am
Coach Services, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 3:48 pm
In Gallardo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:01 pm
In Taylor v Hunt, 2013 WL 620934 (E.D.Tex.) on August 24, 2012, Petitioner Akele Mae Taylor filed an action seeking the return of her son, a minor ("KH") to Canada. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 3:00 pm
In a decision June 26 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:54 am
Holder (voting rights), and United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 12:44 pm
With United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Freeman v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
Rawlins v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 8:32 am
Rawlins v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:25 am
Round two followed; after another seven years, plaintiffs lost again. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 5:14 am
Court of Federal Claims, in which growers from seven states are seeking class action status. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 4:05 am
The case is State Office of Risk Management v. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:00 am
The ACCG, meanwhile, slapped the government with discovery requests.Recent pleadings filed by both parties show just how wide the divide is between the two sides.The battle of U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 10:25 am
In Hart v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 8:01 am
It devolves into a discussion about an obscure abstention principle governing when federal courts may decide cases that raise similar issues to those raised in state court.The case is Kanciper v. [read post]
