Search for: "State v. Williams " Results 6561 - 6580 of 8,285
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm by The Legal Blog
 DESCRIPTIONS OF TESTS - USES, LIMITATIONS AND PRECEDENTSPolygraph Examination9. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:18 am
Steiner, Chapman University School of Law, Rebecca Bauer, and Rohit Talwar have published The Rise and Fall of the Miranda Warnings in Popular Culture in volume 59 of the Cleveland State Law Review (2011). [read post]
16 May 2011, 6:49 am by Sasha Volokh
Environmental economists have a couple of theoretical answers—“[c]ompensating [v]ariation” or “[e]quivalent [v]ariation. [read post]
14 May 2011, 11:27 am by pfriedman
In recounting the historical perspective for its holding the Court quoted eighteenth century remarks attributed to William Pitt, Earl of Chatham, on the occasion of a debate in Parliament: “The poorest man may in his cottage bid defiance to all the forces of the Crown. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am by SHG
E.g., United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:45 am by Kent Scheidegger
  The Court clears up lower court misinterpretations of Williams, Wiggins, and Rompilla, he says, and this is "game changing stuff" if the lower federal courts actually follow it. [read post]
11 May 2011, 6:28 am
 As Dan Ikenson and I wrote a few months ago: [V]oluntary economic exchange is inherently fair, benefits both parties, and allocates scarce resources more efficiently than a system under which government dictates or limits choices. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:27 am by cdw
” In the news, the pretrial hearings have begun in State v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 9:23 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
On April 26, 2011, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Sorrell v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
  And TV presenter Gabby Logan has “hit back at internet lies that she had an affair with colleague Alan Shearer” – and stating that she had never obtained an injunction (see the Daily Mail report). [read post]
8 May 2011, 12:51 am by Michael O'Brien
 The problem is that the plaintiffs made no such admission as Judge William H. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:46 pm by Jon L. Gelman
” Although the Sherman Anti-trust Act had been passed in 1890, the United States Supreme Court decision of U.S. v. [read post]