Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 6561 - 6580
of 9,109
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2012, 5:09 am
You prevent us from funding our own schools? [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
., v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
1195; Butt v. [read post]
Corporate Liability under the Alien Tort Statute of 1789 - Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Shell Petroleum Co.
26 Feb 2012, 2:28 pm
Sosa v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
Hirsi Jamaar and Others v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 1:00 am
The Freedom of Information Act has become a powerful tool for journalists and campaigners at both local and national levels seeking to reveal the workings of the state. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 3:51 pm
The case is Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum (2d Cir. 2010), in which Nigerian plaintiffs seek to hold Royal Dutch/Shell liable for violating the Alien Tort Statute (“ATS”), 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 12:28 pm
The EAA granted a permit for only 14 acres, finding that their proof of historic use was not adequate. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 11:45 am
Adidas offers us Star Trek hoodies and Star Wars sneakers (granted, the Star Trek one is way cool). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 10:05 am
Edwards Aquifer Authority v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:57 am
In State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 2:00 am
At national level, Mr. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:38 pm
In addition to the “general” misleading advertising provisions, the Competition Act also contains a number of other criminal and civil provisions that prohibit or regulate specific types of marketing practices, including deceptive telemarketing, deceptive prize notices, double ticketing, multi-level marketing, pyramid selling schemes, representations not based on adequate and proper tests, false or misleading ordinary selling price claims, misleading or unauthorized use… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:34 pm
In addition to the “general” misleading advertising provisions, the Competition Act also contains a number of other criminal and civil provisions that prohibit or regulate specific types of marketing practices, including deceptive telemarketing, deceptive prize notices, double ticketing, multi-level marketing, pyramid selling schemes, representations not based on adequate and proper tests, false or misleading ordinary selling price claims, misleading or unauthorized use… [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
But Justice Kennedy may have taken the practice to new levels by using some of this information effectively to grant partial summary judgment to the party that lost in the court below. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am
Discussion of the Court’s decision to grant cert. in the affirmative action case Fisher v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:29 pm
-The stairwell at issue was at the back of the store and connected the main level of the store to a lower level of the store; patrons were prohibited from using the stairs, and on the day of the fall, there was a chain across the top of the stairs. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:05 pm
The Court had heard argument in Douglas, et al., v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am
Michael V. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:21 pm
The claim, “Matter of Cappellino v Baumann & Sons Bus Co. [read post]
