Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 6561 - 6580 of 9,848
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2011, 11:12 am by Susan Brenner
On the proofs before us, the State met its burden, and the motion was properly denied. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Howell (D.D.C.) in April, but just posted on Westlaw: Plaintiff is an Assistant United States Attorney ("AUSA") in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, which is part of DOJ. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the government may still be liable for Theresa=s negligence under the FTCA (28 USC 1346 [b]; Haskin, 569 Fed Appx 12; Esgrance v United States, US Dist Ct, SD NY, 17 Civ 8352, Oetken, J., 2018; Jappa v PJR Const. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:14 pm by Daniel Reid
The Court reviewed these elements and the law with respect to the burden of proof as set out by the Supreme Court of Canada in F.H. v. [read post]