Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 6561 - 6580 of 9,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Roberts has occasionally disappointed Republicans (in, most notably, NFIB v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit limited recovery to the attorney's cost. 472 F. 3d 1370 (2006). [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:53 pm by Ben
THE US “REGISTRATION” REQUIREMENT IN COPYRIGHT LAW:The registration requirement is unique to the United States copyright enforcement and has been a topic of debate, in relation to its ambit, since long. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 1:25 pm by Amy Howe
Instead, he has to show that the state court’s decision “was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm by cdw
Accordingly, the holding of the Supreme Court of Ohio was contrary to clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States in Beck v. [read post]
16 Jul 2019, 6:57 pm by Amy Howe
In 1970, Stevens was nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Kiran Bhat
United States to the Federal Circuit; the Blog of Legal Times has coverage. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:00 am by Robert Chesney
That is, Congress should state explicitly that detention authority under the AUMF and the NDAA does not extend to any persons captured within the territory of the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 3:18 pm by Kiera Flynn
United States (relisted after the 9/26 Conference) Docket:  10-9333 Issue(s):  Whether the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:32 am by Amy Howe
And in future cases, Justice Clarence Thomas emphasized, courts should uphold gun restrictions only if there is a tradition of such regulation in United States history. [read post]