Search for: "*u. S. v. Price"
Results 641 - 660
of 873
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2007, 6:04 am
” Payday Advance Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:13 am
Posted by Holli HartmanIn Whitehead v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 12:37 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:08 pm
Mahmood, Constitutional Forum, Centre for Constitutional Studies, Forthcoming ‘Newspaper Libel: With Special Emphasis on Indian Case Law’, Nayan Banerjee, National Law School of India University (NLSIU) ‘Defamation Outside Reputation: Proposals for the Reform of English Law‘, Eric Descheemaeker, University of Edinburgh – School of Law, U. of Edinburgh School of Law Working Paper No. 2011/41 ‘New York Times Co. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:49 am
Adam Kovacevich has dubbed this dynamic “The Prager Effect,” in honor of Prager U’s effort to censorially weaponize the PruneYard case that instead validated YouTube’s editorial rights. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Monopolies are associated in the public mind with higher prices. [read post]
4 May 2009, 5:00 am
The second case is Stack v. [read post]
27 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
[v] Anti-Federal Reserve activists and Internet-world enthusiasts alike admire Bitcoin for not being controlled by any nation’s bank or centralized authority. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 11:11 am
Readers must forgive my skepticism, but there seems to be a lot of “bootstrapping” in OPR’s reasoning here; it appears to rely heavily on 40-plus-year-old legislation enacted in CEQA’s infancy and in the wake of an “energy crisis” spurred by the 1973 oil embargo and its resulting sky-high gasoline prices, fuel shortages, and long queues at gas stations. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
Trump, Twitter & The Law Author: Sheldon Burshtein ISBN: 978-1-988824-61-1 (Trade Paperback) Publisher: Durvile Page Count: 796 Publication Date: September 1, 2020 Regular Price: $49.95 (Paperback) Excerpt: Preface and Chapter 12: The Rule of Law [footnotes omitted] Writing about the presidency of Donald J. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 3:32 am
Cohen (2013 NY Slip Op 50092[U] (Sup. [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
Market prices won't do as a proxy for utility, for a variety of reasons including wealth effects. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
Market prices won't do as a proxy for utility, for a variety of reasons including wealth effects. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:39 pm
Market prices won't do as a proxy for utility, for a variety of reasons including wealth effects. [read post]
10 May 2010, 3:00 am
v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 9:00 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Committee for a Better Arvin v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:39 am
A firm might want to deliver high-end advertisements to wealthy neighborhoods, or to deliver coupons when customers enter the mall, or offer a Burger King discount at a McDonald's, or promote farm-related software in rural areas.[5] In addition, online firms seek to segment markets geographically so that they can price discriminate based on differences in wealth or product demand by geography. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 8:03 am
Chicago Housing Authority v. 3721-3723 Elston Condominium and Tera Healy, 2014 IL App (1st) 130626-U (May 23, 2014). [read post]
