Search for: "A. C. MARTINEZ"
Results 641 - 660
of 721
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2008, 1:31 pm
Martinez v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 4:23 pm
Michels, C. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:20 pm
At the same time, a spokesman for the Senate Republican conference, John C. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 9:45 am
" By the same token, the Appellate Division said that Judge Martinez-Perez could not order Warren to refrain from communicating with Ms. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:48 am
Martinez, 2008 U.S. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:51 pm
Marion County Circuit Court Judge Joseph C. [read post]
16 May 2008, 11:42 am
" C'mon, really? [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:35 pm
Martinez, No. 06-5502 In a sentencing proceeding wherein the district court applied a four-level enhancement to defendant's base offense level after finding, by a preponderance of the evidence, that defendant had used or possessed a firearm in connection with another felony offense, judgment is affirmed where: 1) the district court applied the correct standard of proof to the facts supporting the enhancement; 2) the sentence imposed was reasonable; and 3) the doctrine of constitutional… [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:17 pm
Kelly,] [c]hemotherapy would continue for more than a year, as would requests for upfront payments. [read post]
1 May 2008, 10:15 am
Larson100,000419,2225,023524,245Roman Martinez IV95,000331,8641,805428,669James E. [read post]
29 Apr 2008, 7:13 am
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, April 23, 2008 Martinez v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 2:07 pm
., Kenneth C. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 11:47 am
" CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, IMMIGRATION LAW Martinez v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 10:54 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Lucino Martinez Magno v. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 2:44 pm
Trachtman and Norman C. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 4:31 am
Luna-Martinez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 6:06 am
Martinez, 2008 U.S. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:48 am
Martinez, 2008 UT App 90, 2008 Utah App. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Mabry, No. 06-2324, 06-2322 Defendants' convictions and sentences for conspiring to solicit and obtain prohibited payments from union contractors, and for soliciting and obtaining such payments, in violation of the Taft-Hartley Act, are affirmed over claims that: 1) the informal resolution of a payment dispute qualified as a "settlement" under 29 U.S.C. section 186(c)(2); 2) insufficient evidence presented at trial to support a finding that the exception to liability under… [read post]
