Search for: "A. R. F. Products, Inc. v. the United States" Results 641 - 660 of 1,101
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm by Stefanie Levine
  The United States Supreme Court explained this rationale in the nineteenth century case, Rude v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 8:15 am by Simon Lester
Our analysis proceeds under the two-part test explained in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
United States, 816 F.2d 647, 657 (Fed. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 6:17 pm
  He used the five-factor test for determining whether plaintiffs have antitrust standing articulated by the Supreme Court in Associated Federal Contractors of California, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Beer Institute, Inc.[17] involved a Connecticut statute that required out-of-state beer shippers to affirm that prices posted for products sold to Connecticut wholesalers were, in the relevant period, no higher than prices in bordering states.[18] The Court invalidated these price affirmation schemes on the narrow grounds that they had the "practical effect of controlling . [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 10:04 am by Mark Zamora
App. 558, 559-60 (1986); United Motor Freight Terminal Company Inc. v. [read post]