Search for: "Ace v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2017, 4:33 am
” In an op-ed in the Washington Examiner, Mark Grabowski argues that the justices’ comments during oral argument in Packingham v. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 6:01 pm
While covering these events, my blog has been inundated with comments expressing outrage at FDA and state regulators for raw milk cheese “crackdowns. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 10:20 am
It has been just over ten years since the major decision of R (Laporte) v CC Gloucestershire [2006] UKHL 55; [2007] 2 AC 105, which considered what could amount to a breach of the peace. [read post]
14 Mar 2017, 4:27 am
” At the ACS Blog, Bidish Sarma looks at Turner v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:26 pm
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 4:02 pm
Facebook has said that a legal challenge against the way it transfers EU user data to the United States was “deeply flawed” and should not be referred to the EU’s top court because ample privacy protections were already in place. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm
Having cited Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 and other cases on the topic, the court in its judgment emphasised the importance of the principle of open justice (that justice should be seen to be done) and ruled that, by failing to consult the judiciary before excluding members of the public from the courtroom during the trial, the magistrates court staff had acted unlawfully, and in consequence no valid proceedings had taken place. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am
(The House of Lords has had cause to address earlier iterations of this offence, but through the prism of whether the local authority had complied with its duty to arrange suitable transport to school where necessary: see, for example, Devon CC v George [1989] AC 573.) [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
She also noted [at 50] that in Comic Enterprises Ltd v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 3:34 am
” (quoting Hilton v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 3:07 pm
Monroe Equities, LLC v. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 10:11 am
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:40 am
Research your state's statute of limitation for asbestos cases. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 6:00 am
See McClendon v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 9:00 pm
The Tenure in Office Act was repealed in 1887, and in the case of Myers v. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
In this case, only AC did so. [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 2:01 pm
In this case, only AC did so. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
In a lawsuit brought by Viet Bui and Christina Avalos-Reyes on behalf of themselves and similarly situated employees known as Viet Bui et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
