Search for: "Andrews v. Hand" Results 641 - 660 of 1,574
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a first-hand account of yesterday’s opinion announcements for this blog. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Walter Dellinger
Richard Nixon was so named in the Watergate indictment, and that inclusion was sustained by Judge John Sirica and defended by the United States in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
More: Eugene Volokh; Trevor Burrus; Andrew Grossman on Twitter (“decision is exceedingly narrow and will only hit the most outlier state laws. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 9:26 pm by Anthony Gaughan
As Washington explained in a letter to James Wood, his de facto campaign manager, “my only fear is that you spent with too sparing a hand. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
  There are also several important judgments likely to be handed down this term. [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:13 am by Adam Feldman
For example, the majority and separate opinions in Jesner v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 opinion by Judge Neil Gorsuch in Epic Systems v. [read post]
22 May 2018, 5:30 am by Dan Carvajal
Key Findings Personal saving and investment are necessary for long-term economic growth. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Andrew Grossman and Ilya Shapiro weigh in on New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Andrew Hamm reports on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s contribution to a recent debate between two constitutional-law scholars for this blog. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:52 am by INFORRM
Hunton Andrews Kurth notes that the Article 29 Working Party has released Updated Standard Application Forms for Binding Corporate Rules, providing for instances where data transfers are made from Members States to outside the European Economic Area. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Abbott v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:28 am by Dan Carvajal
The other holds that, for reasons ranging from the power of incumbency to low-information voting to agency problems in government, the fact that most voters do not, say, favor a property tax increase provides little assurance that one will not be imposed on them.[8] It is the latter theory that is at the heart of the property tax limitation regime: the idea that, if elected officials will not listen to the voters, then the voters must take matters into their own hands. [read post]