Search for: "Ani v. State"
Results 641 - 660
of 134,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2024, 11:54 am
The plaintiff stated all the necessary elements to sustain his claim under the Consumer Fraud Act(White v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:42 am
In any event, Mr C was eligible and in priority need for the purposes of Part VII. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am
On 21 May 2024, judgment was handed down in R (On the application of National Council for Civil Liberties) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2024] EWHC 1181 (Admin). [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:07 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 10:03 am
Wade, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:56 am
City of College Park v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:07 am
United States (1930). [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:46 am
For example, compare the majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 7:42 am
The state court in that case explained that in 1970, in Williams v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
The defendants did not make any promises to the plaintiff or take any actions regarding security protocols in the school that amounted to an affirmative undertaking of protection by them on her behalf, nor could the plaintiff have justifiably relied on any such actions (see Vitale v City of New York, 60 NY2d at 863; Wilson v New York City Board of Education, 167 AD3d at 821; Morgan-Word v New York City Dept. of Educ., 161 AD3d at 1068). [read post]
28 May 2024, 6:00 am
The defendants did not make any promises to the plaintiff or take any actions regarding security protocols in the school that amounted to an affirmative undertaking of protection by them on her behalf, nor could the plaintiff have justifiably relied on any such actions (see Vitale v City of New York, 60 NY2d at 863; Wilson v New York City Board of Education, 167 AD3d at 821; Morgan-Word v New York City Dept. of Educ., 161 AD3d at 1068). [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:59 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
28 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of C.M. v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
I believe that the Supreme Court will decide Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 8:58 pm
I put up a short post on the argument in Smith v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:05 pm
United States—the article argues that the tax must satisfy the rules applicable to the taxing power. [read post]
27 May 2024, 3:37 pm
As the Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm
See, Gideon v. [read post]
27 May 2024, 11:54 am
Any employee exempted from vaccination was required to test weekly. [read post]