Search for: "Arthur Law Firm" Results 641 - 660 of 1,820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 11:28 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Law firms and attorneys, the so-called “gatekeepers” connected to ICOs, have moved front and center on the SEC’s radar. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 8:00 am by Matthew Waxman
I came away from it unimpressed by Madison’s early thinking about war powers but respecting his willingness to revisit and even reverse some of his prior assumptions while also holding firm to certain key principles. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:16 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy, partially published opinion filed January 12, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal (Division 3) partly affirmed, but in large part reversed, the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate directing the City of Los Angeles to set aside its FEIR certification and approval of BNSF Railway Company’s (“BNSF”) project to construct a new intermodal railyard facility, near the Port of Los Angeles, to handle containerized cargo transported through the ports of… [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 10:26 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (The non-CEQA, land use law aspects of the opinion will not be analyzed here but will be covered in a subsequent blog post by my partner, Bryan Wenter.) [read post]
15 Jan 2018, 8:05 pm by Nate Nead
Goren, Developments in Unitranche Financing, Practical Law The Journal, 53-60, (2014). [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 6:08 am
Berger, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, on Monday, January 8, 2018 Tags: Boards of Directors, Controlling shareholders, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Dual-class stock, Recapitalization, Securities litigation, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting Raising the Stakes on Board Gender Diversity Posted by Brianna Castro, Glass, Lewis & Co., on Monday, January 8, 2018 Tags: Board composition, Boards of… [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 4:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
As we move into a brand new year of tracking CEQA developments, it seems like an appropriate time to survey and briefly recap some of the many significant published case law developments that occurred over the past year. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU Docket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Wolfgang Demino
ONE MONTH INTO THE FIGHT OVER HEART AND SOUL NOT TO MENTION CONTROL OF THE CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAUDocket entry for 12/22 injunction hearing says "oral arguments heard. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Rzeslawski thus advocates the invocation of state consumer protection (usury cap) laws against assignees of original creditors, and argues against the Valid-When-Made doctrine propagated by lawyers for financial market firms. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am by Wolfgang Demino
Rzeslawski thus advocates the invocation of state consumer protection (usury cap) laws against assignees of original creditors, and argues against the Valid-When-Made doctrine propagated by lawyers for financial market firms. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 5:17 am
On the website of the law firm of Bruch Hanna LLP is a biography for attorney Rory Flynn that, in part, states:Rory C. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Addressing AIR’s four CEQA challenges to the project EIR, the Court held: (1) that use of a 2007 “existing conditions” baseline was supported by substantial evidence and complied with CEQA, in light of the refinery’s current entitlements and history of fluctuating operations; (2) in an issue of first impression, that the project’s compliance with California’s GHG cap-and-trade program supported County’s conclusion pursuant to CEQA Guidelines §… [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 4:07 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Whatever the ultimate business and financial promise of ICOs ultimately may prove to be, they do seem to promise a great deal of business for the ICOs law firms. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 11:35 am by Arthur F. Coon
”  In the accompanying footnote, Justice Benke noted that while moot questions need not be dismissed if they present important questions of law likely [read post]