Search for: "Attorney General v. Superior Court"
Results 641 - 660
of 3,247
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2020, 1:50 pm
Witness interviews likewise drive attorneys’ fees and costs. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11] Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 6:42 am
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania vacated the Superior Court’s ruling and remanded the case back to the Superior Court for reconsideration.[11] Perhaps most importantly, the Supreme Court rejected the Superior Court’s suggestion that the rule of capture does not apply to hydraulic fracturing due to the fact that hydraulic fracturing is an artificial means to stimulate production. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:16 am
AHS appealed and argued that the trial court erred in relying on a federal case, Resolution Trust Corp. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Superior Court (Rackauckas), no. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 12:24 am
” Attorney’s Fees. [read post]
21 Mar 2020, 9:45 am
Several nongovernmental organizations challenged the constitutionality of the regulations in the Israeli High Court of Justice, which issued an interim order in Ben Meir v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:48 am
The wrongful death case, recently handed down by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Green Mountain Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:48 am
The wrongful death case, recently handed down by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, Green Mountain Insurance Company v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 2:44 pm
British Columbia (Attorney General). [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 2:13 pm
As we have noted throughout the years, interpreting the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) can be a difficult task. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Criminal Law: Prison “Administrative Segregation”Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am
One concern that has emerged is that the Minister of Justice suggested in comments that it refers to “a death that is expected ‘in the relatively near-term’ or ‘over a relatively short period of time.'” The inclusion of this requirement in the legislation originally was controversial because Carter did not seem to require it (see here, here and here, for example); nevertheless, it was included and doctors have interpreted the term differently as a result of an… [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm
Statements implying superiority where the differences in adverse reactions are not clinically meaningful would be misleading. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 7:33 pm
Canada (Attorney General), the first time the Court had interpreted the provisions of the Act. [read post]
7 Mar 2020, 5:55 pm
The statute requires detailed notices served by the attorney on the State Police, Attorney General and numerous other government entities. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:34 am
Superior Court of California, 137 S. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 11:31 am
Generally speaking, we have seen two categories of cases where this has occurred. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 5:12 am
In Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam), 2020 SCC 4, the Supreme Court of Canada held (by 5-4 majority) that the motion to strike failed and that the Quebec court had jurisdiction over the entire claim advanced by the Innu. [read post]
29 Feb 2020, 5:12 am
In Newfoundland and Labrador (Attorney General) v Uashaunnuat (Innu of Uashat and of Mani-Utenam), 2020 SCC 4, the Supreme Court of Canada held (by 5-4 majority) that the motion to strike failed and that the Quebec court had jurisdiction over the entire claim advanced by the Innu. [read post]
