Search for: "BENCH v. STATE" Results 641 - 660 of 7,089
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
Although the decision, which following a bench trial, does not specifically address the related requirement in S.B. 826 that companies disclose board member information to the secretary of state, the court’s decision enjoins enforcement of the entire law. [read post]
31 May 2022, 4:51 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The two-week bench trial preceding Justice Crane’s interesting post-trial decision was of two lawsuits consolidated for trial. [read post]
The bench composed of three judges laid down certain directions to the central and state governments: I. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Virginia Milstead
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:26 am by Amichai Cohen, Yuval Shany
On May 4, the Israeli Supreme Court, sitting as a High Court of Justice (HCJ), issued its long-awaited judgment in Abu Aram v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 7:57 am by Sophia Tang
The Original English Judgments 18 March 2015, the high court of Queen’s Bench Division (Commercial Court), England & Wales made a judgment on the case of Spar Shipping AS v Grand China Logistics Holding (Group) Company, Ltd (hereinafter “Spar Case”) . [read post]
16 May 2022, 3:18 am by Peter Mahler
Dennis, Contrivance and Collusion: The Corporate Origins of Shareholder Derivative Litigation in the United States, 67 Rutgers U. [read post]
15 May 2022, 8:02 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
This direction was upheld by the Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan on a constitutional basis, when challenged by the Commissioner, in Canada (Attorney General) v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 7:38 am by Russell Knight
“[In] a bench trial, …[a] judge is presumed to consider only relevant, competent testimony. [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm by Russell Knight
“Generally, the standard of review in a bench trial is whether the order or judgment is against the manifest weight of the evidence” Reliable Fire Equipment Co. v. [read post]