Search for: "Best v. United States"
Results 641 - 660
of 12,055
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2015, 9:30 am
Now the law throughout the United States, California has recognized gay marriage since 2008 (though only by those married during the window before Proposition 8 was passed) and then again in 2013 when the US Supreme Court issued its opinion in Perry v Hollingsworth overturning the Proposition 8 prohibition. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 8:08 am
Best Buy Stores (N.D. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 12:09 am
See United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:56 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 9:15 am
In EMC Corporation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 2:17 pm
United States and Idaho v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:32 am
Applying the maxim "ask, and thou shalt not receive," the district judge in United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in United State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 4:01 pm
A pair of recent decisions by the United States District Court for the Central District of California challenge the strength of the business judgment rule. [read post]
22 Nov 2007, 6:31 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 8:09 am
Below are some samples of their work: STOPPING THE OBSCENITY MADNESS 50 YEARS AFTER ROTH V. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
Fund v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:41 am
ABTO and MZTO were both United States' citizens. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
Michael Stokes Paulsen, Michael McConnell, Sam Bray, and I recently completed and posted the 2023 online supplement to our constitutional law casebook: The Constitution of the United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:53 am
, Lops v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 11:03 am
United States, the only remaining cases argued in the November sitting that have not yet been decided. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 8:24 am
United States was, as Evan Lee put it, “The Battle of the Canons,” the first argument in Torres v. [read post]
23 Nov 2020, 5:55 pm
Bowers, 660 F.2d 527 (5th Cir. 1981) (child abuse); United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
The reason is, as the opinion elaborates at length, the insistence by the United States Supreme Court that it and only it is empowered to overrule past precedents clearly on point, whatever the current strength of those precedents. [read post]
