Search for: "Board of Directors v. Banke" Results 641 - 660 of 1,161
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm by Abbott & Kindermann
The consultant affirmed the suitability of a class 23 exemption, and in May, the Board approved the exemption and the sheriff’s request. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:43 am by Laura Sandwell
R (AM) v The Director of Public Prosecutions; R (AM) v Director of Public Prosecution; and R (Nicklinson & Anor) v Ministry of Justice, heard 16 – 19 December 2013. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
In Board of Directors of The Colchester Towne Condominium Council Of Co-Owners, v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
Hearn de-registered as a lobbyist on May 30, 2010, but that does not matter, said State Ethics Commission Deputy Director Cathy Hazelwood. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 10:54 am by Tom Webley
Three additional practices that reflect increasing emphasis by other regulators include supervision of third party service providers to include security-related contract requirements, establishing a breach response process and providing an annual assessment of the program to the Board of Directors. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:17 am by Lorene Park
A bank employee was fired after reporting fraud and securities violations by her supervisor and the vice president of human resources (McEuen v Riverview Bancorp, Inc). [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 4:49 pm by Jeff Hermes
Jan. 2, 2014) ("Courts that have considered the matter have concluded that Internet message boards and similar communications are generally regarded as containing statements of pure opinion rather than statements or implications of actual, provable fact."); Summit Bank v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The German Federal High Court of Justice has ruled in a landmark decision known as ARAG v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
” In addition, and as can be common in trading chat rooms and message boards, the banter between traders reportedly includes boasts about the ability to manipulate the market, as well as sharing market-sensitive information.[18] Whether those comments are actually true or not, the potential implications will be taken seriously by regulators given the climate and recent issues concerning rate manipulation surrounding Libor. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]