Search for: "Bowes v State"
Results 641 - 660
of 717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
They are Hewitt v Rowlands (1924) 93 LJKB 1080, Calabar Properties v Stitcher [1984] 1 WLR 287 , Wallace v Manchester City Council (1998) 30 HLR 1111 and Earle v Charalambous [2007] HLR 8. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
Last summer, in Espinoza v. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 3:54 am
Compiled from online public domain resources, provided for your review/use is this week's update of key industry news, views, and events highlighting key electronic discovery related stories, developments, and announcements.For a live daily view of industry news, click here for the Vendor Clips Live News Feed.Follow @InfoGovernanceeDiscovery News Content and ConsiderationsCourt Orders Retention of Outside Vendor to Collect Responsive Documents, Investigate Possible Spoliation –… [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
V. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 7:09 am
You pay 8.875% New York State tax – what do you get for that? [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:30 pm
(A&P’s full trade name) v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 12:44 pm
” To borrow Cohen’s theme, the Trump administration is riddled with leaks from bow to stern, and the last 24 hours have shown us that persistent breaches may very well sink this ship. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Whether European supporters may be used to have a beer while watching their sport idols confronting each-other, Brazil was in the process of following a different path, but it appears to have eventually bowed to the content of a private agreement concluded between other parties. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 3:24 pm
Clements-Jeffrey v. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Gideon v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 8:25 am
Chron., Oct. 29, 2008. 9 Elie Mystal, Thank God For Good Lawyers: Google Destroys Libraries, Not The Law, Above The Law, Oct. 29, 2008.10 Authors Guild, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 10:58 am
English: The 2012 Olympics stadium under construction (February 2011), near to Bow, Tower Hamlets, Great Britain. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 12:49 pm
Recent Court Decision In a recent case, R v Sharma, the Ontario Court of Appeal found that two provisions under the CSO section of the Criminal Code infringed section 7 and section 15 Charter rights. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:29 am
Brandeis: A Life,” observes that Brandeis – the co-author of 1890 Harvard Law Review article, “The Right to Privacy,” and a dissenter in Olmstead v. [read post]
24 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
In Berner v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 10:24 am
* From India: The Supreme Court of India today directed Google, Yahoo and Microsoft to set up an in-house mechanism to remove online search results, which has “potential to go counter”to Section 22 of the Pre-Conception & Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, 1994 (Act). * Techdirt: Feds Say Jewelry Company CEO Scrubbed Google Results With Fake Court Orders And Forged Judge’s Signatures * In IMDb v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 6:35 am
” Asked by Miller to explain the comment, Truman stated further: “The main thing is . . . well, it isn’t so much that he’s a bad man. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 12:47 am
Ltd v ZTE Corp., ZTE Deutschland GmbH has already attracted a lot of attention, not least because some good souls have rather forgotten that, while the Advocate General is a member of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and his rulings, always influential, are adopted by the CJEU in an estimated 75-80% of intellectual property cases, his Opinions are not actually the rulings of the court. [read post]
