Search for: "Brown v. U.S. Department of Justice"
Results 641 - 660
of 796
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 10:19 am
Mayer Brown's Partner James R. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am
Along the way, Randolph, along with Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown, have suggested that the government might satisfy its burden merely under a “some evidence” standard, as opposed to the higher, preponderance of the evidence standard the Department of Justice is advocating. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:26 pm
Robbins.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (2d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Amicus brief of the U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 11:58 am
U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:06 am
Brown and J. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 9:45 pm
The Justice Department identified the attorney as Lauren Stevens, of Durham, N.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:00 am
Brown from the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 7:18 am
Southland Corp. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 5:23 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
Sentelle and Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 10:17 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 2:02 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 7:52 am
A U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 9:41 am
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/09/29/08-30339.pdf Brown v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:01 am
Defense attorney Hilliard V. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 8:43 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
" (21) This process should be distinguished conceptually as "general international law", rather than CIL, as the International Court of Justice (ICJ) has often done. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:17 pm
That case is California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al. v. [read post]
