Search for: "Bryant v. Bryant"
Results 641 - 660
of 1,094
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2011, 3:48 pm
Levy Case Caption: Bryant, in his capacity as Executor of the Estate of Richard Jewell v. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 6:16 am
Justice Sotomayor devoted over 11,000 words in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 10:23 am
Bryant, 136 S. [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 1:19 am
On appeal, Ms Tuitt tried to focus on her lack of personal culpability, relying on Sedley LJ in Portsmouth City Council v Bryant [2000] 32 HLR 906 It may very well be unreasonable to make even a suspended order against somebody who will be powerless to rectify the situation and it will almost certainly be unreasonable to make an outright order against such a person. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 3:50 pm
” In 1910, a GM engineer testifying in MacPherson v. [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 7:46 am
Bryant, 996 F.3d 1243, 1260 (11th Cir. 2021) (Brasher, J.). [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:52 am
Arthur Bryant, Appellant.2007 WL 1294430, 2007 N.Y. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court ruling, finding it to have correctly determined that the District's discontinuation of IRMAA reimbursements violated the Act and thus had properly granted the Plaintiffs' petition. * The purpose of the moratorium statute was to tie retiree benefits to active employee benefits so that retirees could benefit from the collective bargaining power of the active employees. ** See Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango… [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:45 am
Phil Bryant couldn’t have been any clearer in his State of the State address, “On this unfortunate anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 7:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court ruling, finding it to have correctly determined that the District's discontinuation of IRMAA reimbursements violated the Act and thus had properly granted the Plaintiffs' petition. * The purpose of the moratorium statute was to tie retiree benefits to active employee benefits so that retirees could benefit from the collective bargaining power of the active employees. ** See Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango… [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court ruling, finding it to have correctly determined that the District's discontinuation of IRMAA reimbursements violated the Act and thus had properly granted the Plaintiffs' petition. * The purpose of the moratorium statute was to tie retiree benefits to active employee benefits so that retirees could benefit from the collective bargaining power of the active employees. ** See Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango… [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division sustained the Supreme Court ruling, finding it to have correctly determined that the District's discontinuation of IRMAA reimbursements violated the Act and thus had properly granted the Plaintiffs' petition. * The purpose of the moratorium statute was to tie retiree benefits to active employee benefits so that retirees could benefit from the collective bargaining power of the active employees. ** See Matter of Bryant v Board of Educ., Chenango… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 12:54 pm
Bryant, 131 S. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am
Bryant, concerning the scope of the “ongoing emergency” standard for determining whether a victim’s statement is testimonial under Crawford v. [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 5:53 am
B.J.F. (1989) and Gawker Media v. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 6:19 pm
Earlier this year Michigan v. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 3:09 am
In Bryant v. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 1:30 pm
Com. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
" The cardiologist made reference to the fact that Rivera suffered from a variety of risk factors commonly associated with coronary heart disease, including obesity and hypertension.The Appellate Division said that it had previously held "the [statutory] presumption is effectively rebutted when evidence of risk factors is coupled with expert testimony that excludes an applicant's employment as a causative factor," citing Bryant v Hevesi, 41 AD3d at 932.The… [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:30 am
The defendants cited to Bryant v. [read post]
