Search for: "Burden v. Burden"
Results 641 - 660
of 34,370
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2024, 1:42 pm
” Rhode v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 10:05 am
Circuit's conclusion inUnited States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:40 am
He failed to do so, the court concluded, because certain directors did not face a substantial likelihood of liability for the oversight, waste, and disclosure claims, and one of the directors was sufficiently independent from Skechers’ founder and largest shareholder (Conte v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
His petition, alleged, among other things, that the determination was arbitrary and capricious.The Appellate Division, citing, Matter of Trager v Suffolk County, 185 AD3d 697, explained "An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated ... for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason".* Further, the decision notes that "In demonstrating that administrative actions were made in bad… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
His petition, alleged, among other things, that the determination was arbitrary and capricious.The Appellate Division, citing, Matter of Trager v Suffolk County, 185 AD3d 697, explained "An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated ... for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason".* Further, the decision notes that "In demonstrating that administrative actions were made in bad… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:27 am
In Eze v Adderley Body Corporate (https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2024/7.html), the court answered this question in the affirmative. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 3:25 am
Billy Stott v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:58 pm
Along with the Supreme Court’s affirmation of the high burden of proof employer must meet to justify refusing to grant religious accommodations to employees in Groff v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:39 am
Given Billings’s 'minimal' burden at this stage, these allegations support a plausible inference of discrimination. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
Larue v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:44 am
Singh v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
In Long v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:15 am
But Defendants failed to carry their burden. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:21 pm
Class V. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
In USA law, the burden of proof is on the claimant. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
PRACTICE NOTE: As a case is being worked up for trial, practitioners should keep a list of all potential issues AND what their burden of proof is on each issue. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am
Instead, he attended Howard University but still dealt with financial burdens. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:55 am
First, this Note reasons that, in Lyng v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
Co. v. [read post]
