Search for: "CALIFORNIA COMPANY v. STATE INDUSTRIAL COURT" Results 641 - 660 of 2,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2022, 10:35 am by Eric Goldman
Prior CCPA/CPRA Posts * Court Casts Doubt on the Legality of the Data Brokerage Industry–Brooks v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am by Richard Reibstein Esq.
” The case was initially filed in 2008 in federal court in Massachusetts by four plaintiffs (three from California and one from Massachusetts) as a putative class action covering franchisees in a number of states. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
08/18/2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA REBECCA HOWELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 7:34 am by Shane Peagler
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California fully denying Snap’s Motion to Dismiss the Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. [read post]
District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin rejected the arguments of defendants Taiwan Kai Yih Industrial Co., Ltd., Gordon Auto Body Parts, Auto Parts Industrial, Ltd., Jui Li Enterprise Company, Ltd., TYG Products, L.P. and Cornerstone Auto Parts, LLC that the plaintiffs failed to properly state a claim. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:26 am by Nassiri Law
Gavin Newsom’s signature – would expand the definition of “independent contractor” to more closely match that which was outlined in last year’s California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 1:34 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Rules of Court, rule 8.272(c)(2); see Pacific Legal Foundation v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:34 am by Edith Roberts
Lundgren, in which the justices will consider tribal immunity from state-court actions to adjudicate title to land. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 8:29 am by Shari Shapiro
  California is the only state to have a state-wide green building code, CALGREEN, which went into effect on January 1, 2011. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:45 pm
Ford Motor Co. (9th Cir. 2007) 500 F.3d 963), the company offered an instruction that the court believed more accurately presaged the 2007 Philip Morris v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 1:32 am
 The case is one of the first California state appellate court to rule on the parameters of employers’ duties under the  California Labor Code requiring rest and meal breaks for hourly employees. [read post]