Search for: "CANNING v. DOJ"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,715
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2021, 12:27 pm
Supreme Court in its opinion, Lozman v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:33 pm
Texas (Updated)–11/10/20 Biden Administration Reverses DOJ Position in Texas ACA Case—2/10/21 The Risks to the ACA of a Standing Decision in California v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:23 pm
The case is Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 7:47 am
Delrahim reinforced that message to the Biden (or Garland) DOJ by saying he "can't imagine" the DOJ would depart from his SEP policies "given the strength of the Ninth Circuit decision" in FTC v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:58 am
Implications This opinion rejected numerous DOJ positions, so the DOJ will need to reexamine how it interprets the CFAA. [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 2:15 pm
Instead, a protester, through its outside counsel, can discuss the need for a stay pending the COFC’s decision, with DOJ counsel (DOJ counsel represents the procuring agency before the COFC). [read post]
4 Jun 2021, 12:30 pm
Last summer, in Espinoza v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 6:04 pm
For example, in Facebook v. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:04 am
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently addressed the issue in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
May 3, 2021) the court took a similar approach, observing that DOJ guidance was entitled to “great deference. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:01 am
Related Cases: Rock the Vote v. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:41 am
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit concluded that the plaintiffs in Juliana v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:24 pm
I point out that American policyholders seem to share this enthusiasm, at least judging from the questions the presiding judge in Epic v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:38 am
In Laufer v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
22 May 2021, 7:12 am
He obviously had to answer the question of whether he'd have taken a side-letter deal in the affirmative: you can't allege antitrust harm for yourself because you want to bring about change for others (simply put, Epic is not the FTC or the DOJ, who can sue on behalf of everyone). [read post]
18 May 2021, 6:21 am
"SCOPA") recently issued an opinion in Pittsburgh Logistics Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 12:39 pm
Take advantage of our FREE consultation to tell us your legal needs and we can discuss whether our firm is a good fit for you. [read post]
5 May 2021, 5:02 am
" In Rasoulzadeh v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 7:30 am
Maag v. [read post]
